What are common qualifiers that authors might use to make their arguments stronger?

• A. Words such as 'always' and 'never'
• B. Words such as 'might' and 'could'
• C. Words such as 'often,' 'generally,' or 'in many cases'
• D. Words such as 'certainly' and 'definitely'

Answer: (C)

Using qualifiers is an important strategy for authors to bolster their arguments by allowing for flexibility and acknowledging the complexity of the subject matter. The correct answer highlights the use of terms like "often," "generally," or "in many cases." These qualifiers indicate a recognition that while there may be a prevalent trend or tendency, there are exceptions and variations that should be considered. This approach makes the argument more nuanced and credible because it avoids absolute claims that could be easily challenged or disproven.

In contrast to absolute terms like "always" and "never," which can make arguments sound dogmatic and less trustworthy, the selected qualifiers create room for discussion and acknowledge the possibility of differing circumstances. This strategy not only strengthens the argument itself but also engages the reader by presenting a balanced view. Furthermore, qualifiers such as "might" and "could," while also conveying uncertainty, do not capture the same level of frequency or commonality as those in the correct choice, which emphasizes typical cases rather than possibilities. Similarly, "certainly" and "definitely" suggest a level of certainty that can undermine the perception of a well-rounded argument. Thus, the nuanced approach provided by the correct answer serves as a compelling means of persuasion.